The following thought(s) occurred to me as I read this piece (suppositions a/k/a "conspiracy theories" ... for now). Particularly the mentions of blood clotting, a phrase associated with the "vaccines":
a) Besides the goal of taking-down the U.S., or at least neutering it (especially with a now-grievously weakened military and CCP-compromised "Commander in Chief"), a nuclear exchange could consummate the depopulation agenda that increasingly appears to be the actual purpose of Covid and the "vaccines."
b) A nuclear exchange would provide "plausible deniability" for mass deaths being caused by the "vaccines" for years to come ("they died of the long-term effects of radiation exposure").
c) Are people who had one or more injections of the "vaccine" more susceptible to succumbing to radiation exposure? If so, is this part of the design of the "vaccines?"
d) What then does this portend for our almost universally "vaccinated" military personnel?
e) (Wink wink) What is the "carbon footprint" of nuclear weapons, and what might that do with "climate change." [Yes, we know that CO2 is plant food, not a pollutant, and "climate change" is a fabricated "crisis."]
f) Finally, a nuclear exchange (any scale) would provide nifty excuses for declaring martial law and/or "postponing" elections.
With the US Govt. purchasing $290 million of Nplate I am trying to connect the dots. Porous southern border with thousands unvetted illegals crossing daily, drug and possibly weapons of mass destruction smuggling operations. Disaster Preparedness ads all of sudden popping up in New York and New Jersey not just a coincidence. I don't buy the nuclear exchange with Russia explanation. It is a convenient alibi. What I think is going on is the administration is preparing for a terrorist attack involving nuclear weapons with the New York City area the target. Your thoughts Mr. Faddis.
The following thought(s) occurred to me as I read this piece (suppositions a/k/a "conspiracy theories" ... for now). Particularly the mentions of blood clotting, a phrase associated with the "vaccines":
a) Besides the goal of taking-down the U.S., or at least neutering it (especially with a now-grievously weakened military and CCP-compromised "Commander in Chief"), a nuclear exchange could consummate the depopulation agenda that increasingly appears to be the actual purpose of Covid and the "vaccines."
b) A nuclear exchange would provide "plausible deniability" for mass deaths being caused by the "vaccines" for years to come ("they died of the long-term effects of radiation exposure").
c) Are people who had one or more injections of the "vaccine" more susceptible to succumbing to radiation exposure? If so, is this part of the design of the "vaccines?"
d) What then does this portend for our almost universally "vaccinated" military personnel?
e) (Wink wink) What is the "carbon footprint" of nuclear weapons, and what might that do with "climate change." [Yes, we know that CO2 is plant food, not a pollutant, and "climate change" is a fabricated "crisis."]
f) Finally, a nuclear exchange (any scale) would provide nifty excuses for declaring martial law and/or "postponing" elections.
With the US Govt. purchasing $290 million of Nplate I am trying to connect the dots. Porous southern border with thousands unvetted illegals crossing daily, drug and possibly weapons of mass destruction smuggling operations. Disaster Preparedness ads all of sudden popping up in New York and New Jersey not just a coincidence. I don't buy the nuclear exchange with Russia explanation. It is a convenient alibi. What I think is going on is the administration is preparing for a terrorist attack involving nuclear weapons with the New York City area the target. Your thoughts Mr. Faddis.